Use one prompt taxonomy everywhere
Keep audience, intent, funnel stage, topic, and market labels consistent across every model. Comparisons remain meaningful as the program grows.
Measure brand presence across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity with one prompt structure and one evidence trail.
| Prompt | Topic | Models | Visibility | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best project management software for startups | Commercial | 82% | +12 | |
| Tools for distributed product teams | Use case | 71% | +8 | |
| Fastest issue tracker for engineering | Commercial | 64% | +5 | |
| How to manage a product roadmap | Informational | 57% | +4 | |
| Linear alternatives for enterprise teams | Comparison | 47% | +3 |
A shared model view helps teams stop reacting to isolated screenshots and start managing repeatable, comparable search signals.
Models compared
4
with one prompt taxonomy
Tracked prompts
200
grouped by buyer intent
Evidence history
365d
retained by response
Recent changes
A prompt without an audience, intent, market, and business decision is difficult to act on. Sight keeps those fields visible beside the answer and its history.
Keep audience, intent, funnel stage, topic, and market labels consistent across every model. Comparisons remain meaningful as the program grows.
Every chart can be traced to the underlying answer, citation, model, date, and prompt. Teams can explain why a metric moved and what changed in the evidence.
Combine answer visibility with page quality, competitor strength, technical blockers, and business relevance to create a defensible action list.
Start with a free public scan, then move into prompt tracking when you need repeatable evidence, history, and team workflows.